Logic dictates that entity A cannot be entity B, and when we occur to valuate that do the representations we have from ourselves truly represent ourselves, in relativity with this simple logic, the response need to be “No”. The entity we are perceiving in our consciousness is mixed of models of data, and is a virtual entity, similarly with our pals and foes we understand in our consciousness even when they are not about. And Best neurologist Dubai lack the neurological detail, every thing that we know as the bodily basis of our existence, each identified sort of self-recognition, and are immaterial in the atmosphere. And as our perception of the atmosphere is representational, when the external resource of an personal we know is not at existing, the illustration of the individual we have in our consciousness does not have a mind of its possess, but is the specific then active picture we have from him/her, every single of them made in relativity with our own inside complexity and the dynamics of the sub-consciousness.

It should now also be acknowledged that our individuality, not the soul, is described also in neurological, cellural and in genetic level, i.e. that the combination of atoms in molecular amount is what helps make us human people, obtaining the one-2% variation in genetic stage, making us distinctive in bodily style. Nevertheless, in the experiments done by means of cloning also point out by means of deductions that, the exclusive observer/soul are not able to be replicated however identical the genome that makes the chain response of combining the physique were in between mammals, not to mention that the mix of genes that is able to build the person self of us does not emerge anywhere in the whole cosmos and over and above during our existence, transcending us to these spatial co-ordinates. If the observer/soul was by some means joined amongst the two cloned Dolly sheep, it would have needed some Cartesian receiver-transceiver system, enabling them to deliver and acquire neural impulses from each and every of other in order to build collective self-recognition, but their genome had no such blueprints for it to be formed. Ego, or Das Ich (The I, or I by itself) as Freud would have expressed or soul is for that reason not some thing that can be replicated nor can it be divided to a number of bodies, forming a collective consciousness with an specific (1) moi.

In purchase for info to be in consciousness, it demands neurological assistance system that can include information. This is the identical with innate details programs in neurological stage, for without having qualifying and unique properties, the neurons and specialised receptors in various elements of the brains and for case in point neurons that are accountable and that allow motor jobs could not exist. Yet again, memory cells and for example synapses require distinct molecular combination of atoms in purchase to exist and as a result units of info these memory cells and synapses include should also have a distinctive molecular blend per device of info, given that in any other case contained units data must be considered as some magical meta-impulses that are contained in memory cells, identical in molecular mix, although made up of diverse units of info. But on the other hand, power in its sort of details in neurological cognitive systems is yet with no any recognizable sorts, i.e. that for instance this waveform signifies “a peanut”, and this “Plato”, and the mixture of these is waveforms is “Plato in a peanut” and even much more, the dilemma of indicating which memory mobile consists of the searched device of details is minimal by the absence of technologies of being in a position to scan neurons in the stage of molecular combination.

The distribution of data that are blended to a illustration from diverse locations and lobes of the brains can’t be traced in the stage of obtaining distinct units of data. But non-the-considerably less, the way our retina bargains with the individual photons is that they are translated to neural impulses and are very first despatched to specific neurons in the visual cortex until finally sent to various perception-relative locations of brains to type the large image (V3-V5), for the duration of the articles generative cycle before representations emerge to consciousness, with parallel categorical types of related details (from dimensions of details this sort of as colour, flavor, semantics, feelings, appears, etc. from other neurological techniques). Because of the technological limitations, the only way to technique this subject at hand is logic. The 1st sensible deduction is that the brains type representations from merged models of details, with the content created by the micro-amount neurocomputation for the individual’s consciousness.

The 2nd sensible deduction is that because diverse regions of the brains perform various jobs with relatively different types of data, the information that consciousness gets as the total representation of the atmosphere is composed of models of data personal locations of the brains have processed. The third reasonable deduction is that brains are in constant constructive condition in relativity with the info translated by senses of the environmental situations and in relativity with the information previously contained by the memory methods. And the fourth and most apparent reasonable deduction is as a result that the categorical rising complexity defines the units of details that is to be employed by the constructive and re-constructive actions of our brains even though developing representations. The identical deductions of this re-constructive actions of our brains to build representations from models of data in diverse memory techniques have been manufactured by F. C. Bartlett in as early as 1932:

“The first notion to get rid of is that memory is largely or practically reduplicative, or reproductive. In a world of continuously changing surroundings, literal recall is extraordinarily unimportant. If we consider proof fairly than supposition, memory seems to be far far more decisively an affair of design fairly than one of mere copy”

Now, in neurological representation of an individual, i.e. the molecular mixture of an person containing all the models of details, which includes the different information methods in the amounts of specific neurons, memory cells, sysnapses, and many others. and the techniques and representations they make in mix and as sums of their components, the innate neurological composition generates the frame of value-relative constancies, with the individual genetic variations. The growing complexity (for instance development of dendritic spines for an anatomical substrate for memory storage and synaptic transmission) following the start in relations to the information of the environment and coping with the reality can for instance exceed in this kind of types as motor duties, emotional responses, understanding to understand objects by the smell value-comparatively merged to them, and so forth. Digital information this sort of as representations of moral actions practically extends the innate behavioral designs and produce almost extended price-relative conduct, growing the complexity of the neurological representation of the self. The current virtual data about the atomic mix of the environment, i.e. the atomic quantum fact to make the unique big difference between the details that contains and not-containing surroundings, chemical reactions and the regulations of physics practically extends the innate ability on understanding the setting. Religions lengthen the innate character almost to a religious dimension. The information society systems virtually extend the innate group habits.

I mention these examples because the neurological representation of an person is prolonged by virtual information, that is, an specific is also the data he/she includes, adding a 3rd dimension which is over and above the Cartesian dualism. The escalating complexity in the group of etiquette increases the neurological representation of an specific in relations with the behavior in accordance with etiquette. As the characteristics are yet again regarded as as models that are common, the energetic combination of them defines that location of the neurological illustration of an person. The far more one attribute increases in complexity, the far more units of details exists in such attribute in the neurological representation of an individual. Thus, the much more 1 virtually extends one’s innate character in the dimension of sensible enterprise transactions, the much more nearly prolonged the innate nature the neurological illustration of an person becomes.

Now, as it isn’t the representational self that moves in the surroundings, but the neurological illustration of the self, it is healthful to make a obvious variation among these two distinct amounts of currently being. The representational self is a fantasane entity, and the neurological self is the genuine manifestation of an person. The way we transfer in the atomic reality is in relativity with the active neurological mixture in our micro-degree neurocomputation, and its dynamics are in constant state spatial shifts. These shifts and the lively blend of them determine specifically the place we are in the psychological space, and the spot our actual physical being manifests is described by the spatial co-ordinates we exist in in the space-time continuum of the cosmos. In the two situations, the place our neurological and atomic existence is found, it is the actual location we exist in.